DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF WAVAL RECORDS
401 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR4344-13
36 Nov 13
#
e to your applic ur naval
isions ©
ation for correction of yo
£ 10 USC 1552.
rection of Naval Records,
e Board for cor
your appli
ion, considered
d injustice were
ance with.
gs of this Board. boc
ssted of your application,
port thereof, your naval
In additio
record and
ubmitted in sup
m, the Board
all material 8
applicable atatutes, regulations and policies.
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/227
dated 30 July 2013, a copy of which is attached.
record,
‘dGeration of the entire
insufficient to
injustice. In
establish the ext
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. accordingly, your application has
£ the members of the panel will be
been denied. The names and votes oO
furnished upon request.
a that the circumstan
n cannot be taken.
ces of your cas
You are entitle
ion of new and mater
d to have the Board
It is regrette
dal evidence
favorable actio
reconsider its decision upon submiss
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
t to keep in mind that a presumption of
when
4c is importan
ords. consequently,
regard,
regularity attaches to all official rec
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
Sincerely,
., .
4 Nae Wet
Executive tirde
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04212-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He d is contract was not a reen l “A ” schoo l at the request of h is rat list ment. SNM on ly en listed for 4 years w list ment w ith a 2 year ith no extens in ion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07945-08
Your alle accordance with mce to your application for correction of your naval o the provisions of 10 USC 1552. nel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ive session, considered your application on 6 October ations of error and injustice were reviewed in dministrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedin the Board consis submitted in sup statutes, regula the advisory opi a copy of which After careful an the Board found establish the ex this connection, contained in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR760 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 29 July 2014, a copy of whic is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to) demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08205-00
On 13 October 1999, Petitioner, then a Petitioner's appeal was denied. received NJP for intending to deceive 60 days Analysis. Petitioner, however, was just following the orders of his staff sergeant when he typed the false official document.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11177-07
Your allegations of error and n accordance with administrative S applicable to the proceedings of this ial considered by the Board consisted of r with all material submitted in support d and applicable statutes, regulations n, the Board considered the advisory dquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) dated 12 a letter from HQMC dated 29 July 1999, hed. ntious consideration of the entire hat the evidence submitted was the existence of probable material his connection the Board substantially ts...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10889-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted f your application, together with all material submitted in support hereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations a d policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03469-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 9 May 2008 with enclosure (your performance evaluation report for 1 July to 15 November 2002), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04352-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.